Due to a recent change in the UW System Transfer Policy, the Admissions Office would like the second bullet in this section changed to the following (or similar wording). If you have questions, please contact Cathy Glennon, Director of Admissions. Thanks!
I have some questions about using the math placement exam as a means of testing out of the quantitative literacy requirment. If placing in level 7 demonstrates sufficient quantitative literacy to satisfy the GEP requirement, then it seems logical to infer that the math placement exam adequately assesses the learning outocmes associated with the quant. lit. requirement. Is that a correct inference? If this inference is correct, then can a student request to take the math placement exam as a means of testing out?
Also, do the prerequisite math courses associated with level 7 then, by default, satisfy the quantitative literacy requirement? It also seems logical to infer that if placing into level 7 demonstrates a student has achieved the learning outcomes of the QL requirement, then passing the preequisites for level 7 should also demonstrate that those learning outcomes have been met. I reserve the right to incorrect about this, but I am picturing that it would be entirely conceivable for a student to place below level 7, go on to major in a quantitative natural science like physics (or even double-major in physics and math for that matter), and still not have satisfied the quantitative literacy requirement. It would really depend on whether or not the math courses are designate as QL. The GEP physics courses taken by a mjaor will be designated as NS and won't apply to QL. If I am thinking about this correctly, then either the palcement exam itself is a loophole, or there is a doughnut hole in the QL requirement.
From: Sage, JamesPosted: 9/23/2011 9:07 AMSubject: Section 2: Transferring Credit to UWSP